Fw: REFLECTOR: Aircraft Condition Notice

Scott Derrick scott at tnstaafl.net
Tue Mar 7 22:33:56 CST 2006


Andy, you seem hell bent on missing the point.

Andrew Ellzey wrote:
> The Revision date of pages 127 through 132 of 8130.2E is 7/22/2003.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Derrick" <scott at tnstaafl.net>
> To: "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list" <reflector at tvbf.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: REFLECTOR: Aircraft Condition Notice
>
>
>> paragraph 19 is the new, as of a year or so ago, suggestion to FSDO's 
>> on what should be in the O.L.
>> In other words, if you were to get your O.L.s re issued or a new OL 
>> issued the FSDO inspector "may" use this as a template. It doesn't 
>> mean he or she will.
>>
>> Your requirement as an owner of an Experimental Homebuilt is to 
>> follow the Operating Limitations issued to YOUR airplane.  OL's 
>> issued to other airplanes mean nothing to what your required to do..
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> Andrew Ellzey wrote:
>>>
>>> See attached document 8130.2E page 130 paragraph (19). Maybe your 
>>> guy didn't know his FAR's or just didn't want to be bothered.
>>>  My thoughts.
>>>  Andy
>>>
>>>     ----- Original Message -----
>>>     *From:* HYTEC45 at aol.com <mailto:HYTEC45 at aol.com>
>>>     *To:* reflector at tvbf.org <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>
>>>     *Sent:* Tuesday, March 07, 2006 9:22 AM
>>>     *Subject:* Re: REFLECTOR: Aircraft Condition Notice
>>>
>>>     In a message dated 3/7/2006 6:50:38 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>>>     scott at tnstaafl.net <mailto:scott at tnstaafl.net> writes:
>>>
>>>         The FSDO
>>>         inspector  knew how to read the FAR's, and was very clear that
>>>         the FAA
>>>         in an official capacity didn't want to know about any
>>>         inspections or
>>>         changes I made to my plane. That was "my" responsibility and
>>>         only "my"
>>>         responsibility as spelled out in my O/L's and the FARS's.
>>>
>>>     I'm not really concerned about the FAA, I'm concern is with the
>>>     Insurance companies.  If we throw them into the discussion, they
>>>     are the ones who will kick back a claim if things are not
>>>     documented and the operating instructions are followed.
>>>      TEC
>>>
>>>     
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     To change your email address, visit
>>>     http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>>
>>>     Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>>     user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>>     Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>>     Check old archives:
>>>     http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> To change your email address, visit 
>>> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>>
>>> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> To change your email address, visit 
>> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>
>> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit 
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>


More information about the Reflector mailing list