REFLECTOR: Fuel sight guages..why?
Grigore Rosu
grigore.rosu at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 10:39:23 CST 2008
Perhaps I am over-paranoid, but I have an 8-month boy, who knocks everything
down in his way and who will be 1-2-3 year old when I'll fly the Velocity
I'm building. I see no other bigger temptation for him in the back seat
than to pull the tube of the sight gauge that came with the kit. Therefore,
I decided to go with the Atkinson ones, even though I had a hard time
accepting to pay $126 for a pair. I really don't see why they are so
expensive; there is really no big deal to build them.
For the same reasons expressed by Sctt and others above, I think they ar
useful and not that risky.
Grigore
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Scott Derrick <scott at tnstaafl.net> wrote:
> The way I see it, the sight gauges are a fool proof method of ascertaining
> your fuel status, they just work. Period. They are simple to fabricate and
> almost idiot proof. If you change the hoses every 5 years there is almost
> no chance of a leak. You have a lot more fuel lines in the cabin behind
> teh seat.
>
> Yes I have electric fuel gauges, yes I have a fuel flow meter also.
>
> I still like to get in, look at the panel gauges, look over my shoulder at
> the sight gauges and verify that all is according to Hoyle...
>
> Scott
>
> > Ok Guys, I have been pondering this question for some time. Why do we
> > have fuel sight gauges in our Velocities? The rationale for my doubt is
> > as follows:
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.. Before we fly, we visually observe and measure the fuel quantities
> > in each tank. We know our fuel burn. We know flying time. Therefore
> > we always know our fuel state. Nothing else required. Unless...
> > 2.. We had fuel going somewhere other than into our cylinders. IE we
> > have a leak! Ok, we add fuel gauges. My understanding is that fuel
> > gauges and associated sensing equipment is much more reliable than it
> > was in my 1977 C172.
> > 3.. Most installations have some sort of a fuel flow (fuel used)
> > computer to be used as a third source of fuel status. Mine will.
> >
> >
> > There we have it. Three layers of redundancy. We could lose any two
> and
> > still be aware of our fuel state. Why add more complexity to our
> machines
> > by bringing fuel inside the cabin?
> >
> >
> >
> > Since so many people have the sight gauges, I fear I am missing
> something.
> > Your considered opinions and thoughts please........at some point I am
> > going to be building the strakes! Let me know what you think.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks...Brooke
> >
> > XLRG-5
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > To change your email address, visit
> > http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
> >
> > Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> > user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> > Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> > Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20080214/22269ae2/attachment.htm
More information about the Reflector
mailing list