REFLECTOR: Aircraft Inspection prior to flight
KeithHallsten
KeithHallsten at quiknet.com
Wed Sep 8 22:37:18 CDT 2004
Well, it may be real handy, but it's not legal. As to being open to
interpretation, it's the FAA's interpretation that would get your ticket
pulled. I'm sure this regulation has been violated hundreds of times, but
don't be the one who gets caught! You can also check the EAA's guidance on
this matter - it's pretty clear.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Derrick" <scott at tnstaafl.net>
To: "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list" <reflector at tvbf.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Aircraft Inspection prior to flight
> I think this is one of those areas open to interpretation.
>
> When I was diagnosing a flutter problem, it would have been near
impossible
> to do it without a co-pilot. I wasn't in phase one though..
>
> I think if your trying to solve some issue that involves many systems it
> would be appropriate.
>
> Scott
>
> At 07:07 PM 9/8/2004, Keith Hallsten wrote:
> >Not so. The FAA is pretty serious about this one, and can make life
really
> >difficult if they find anyone other than the pilot in an experimental
during
> >the Phase I test period. Only multi-engine aircraft with complex systems
> >have more than one pilot as "required crew". Only required crewmembers
are
> >permitted to be aboard during Phase I test flights. You can use an
> >electronic data logger, tape recorder, video camcorder, etc., but not
> >another pilot!
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tom Martino" <tmartino at troubleshooter.com>
> >To: "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list" <reflector at tvbf.org>
> >Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 9:02 AM
> >Subject: RE: REFLECTOR: Aircraft Inspection prior to flight
> >
> > > I was told that you can carry one passenger designated as a "crew"
member,
> >if they are a licensed pilot and their function is to record data.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: MMurp16900 at aol.com [mailto:MMurp16900 at aol.com]
> > > Sent: Wed 9/8/2004 8:31 AM
> > > To: reflector at tvbf.org
> > > Cc:
> > > Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Aircraft Inspection prior to flight
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Ronnie
> > > I question the legality of caring passenger during phase one testing?
(
> >i.e.25 or 40 hours.)
> > > Mack
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
> >----
> >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To change your email address, visit
> >http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
> > >
> > > Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> > > user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> > > Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> > > Check old archives:
http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >To change your email address, visit
> >http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
> >
> >Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> >user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> >Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> >Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
> "Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither."
> - Benjamin Franklin
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
More information about the Reflector
mailing list