REFLECTOR: Nose gear fork
Scott Derrick
scott at tnstaafl.net
Tue Jun 15 09:11:22 CDT 2004
Alex,
I agree and disagree. The old fork was designed and thought to be up to
the task. And from what I know many a bird is still flying with many hours
on that older design. Velocity wasn't selling something they thought would
fail.. When it proved to have a weakness a new fork was produced and from
the prices I've seen it is being sold for close to their cost as an
upgrade. A pretty good deal in my mind.
I don't know how many airplanes you've owned, but I never had an AD paid
for by the factory, ever. I paid for them, 100%.
Scott
At 09:13 PM 6/14/2004, you wrote:
>Yea, about that- a LOT of us are having to call up the factory and pay for
>a properly engineered and constructed fork after paying already for the
>old style, improperly engineered fork- kind of sits badly with me- this is
>not like the improved stuff like toe brakes, and ball bearing seat rails,
>this is an issue that should be addressed like an AD and paid for by the
>factory, not us..... oh well, I am not going to start a pissing match over
>it, so I will patiently wait for their machinist to get mine done (another
>2 weeks I am told)
>-----Original Message-----
"Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither."
- Benjamin Franklin
More information about the Reflector
mailing list