REFLECTOR: Aileron Rolls

Jim Sower canarder at frontiernet.net
Sat Aug 7 11:21:25 CDT 2004


That's why it's NOT  regarded as an acrobatic airplane.  High aspect 
ratio wings like ours with less-than-stunning aileron area/deflection 
result in very poor roll rates.  The result is that when you attempt a 
maneuver that requires lots of roll (like an aileron roll) you will 
scoop out so hell wouldn't have it.  You can compensate by starting the 
maneuver with a rising velocity vector.  I pull my nose up sharply 
before starting the roll.  I don't have to gain any altitude, just 
establish a significant upward component of my velocity vector.  Try 
that a couple of times (starting with higher airspeeds, higher nose 
attitude, and reducing nose up as results permit).  You also might try 
keeping some G on the airplane and kicking in a lot of rudder.  Swept 
wings tend to enhance roll-yaw coupling if you have enough rudder 
authority (Velocitys typically don't have much so check if you have at 
least 3.5" - 4" rudder available for the maneuver).  Airspeed is your 
friend.  It makes you roll faster  The quicker you get it done, the less 
you scoop out.

I've done a couple.  Performance was substandard so I don't do it any 
more ... Jim S.



Lynn Gallup wrote:

>Fred,
>I have practiced aileron rolls about twenty times and they are always
>terrible. I have talked to Scott Swing by phone to learn his technique and
>to one other Velocity owner, Kirk Lindberg. But try as I might I always wind
>up in a dive to one side or the other depending upon the direction of the
>roll. I have never accomplished a roll with less than 800 ft. loss of
>altitude except once I did it with 500 ft. loss but have never been able to
>duplicate it. When you were learning to do them was there a particular thing
>which stands out as as the "secret"? (Mine is a long-wing,  maybe that makes
>a difference.)
>Thanks,
>Lynn
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Fred Marconi" <fmarconi at bellsouth.net>
>To: <Jim_Agnew_2 at yahoo.com>; "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list"
><reflector at tvbf.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:30 PM
>Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Aileron self-centering
>
>
>  
>
>>  What am I missing.  We have done aileron rolls with N244FM the plane
>>respons beautifully and I have just a standard set up except my tubes are
>>steel rather than the aluminum.
>>
>>  Fred
>>
>>  ----- Original Message ----- 
>>  From: "Jim Agnew" <jim_agnew_2 at yahoo.com>
>>  To: "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list" <reflector at tvbf.org>
>>  Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:59 PM
>>  Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Aileron self-centering
>>
>>
>>  > Ronnie,
>>  >
>>  > The answer is simple, the AL tube in a direct twisting
>>  > application will deliver all of the torque and motion to
>>  > the aileron.  When it is swung through an arc the AL tub
>>  > will suddenly bow when the aileron load becomes to high and
>>  > the torque is transformed into a bowing of the tube rather
>>  > than moving the aileron.
>>  >
>>  > Jim
>>  > --- Ronnie Brown <romott at adelphia.net> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > I'm not sure you have a problem.
>>  > >
>>  > > The 172 that I flew for 10 years didn't do a very good
>>  > > job of returning to
>>  > > wings level if you turned the yoke loose while in a turn.
>>  > >  In fact, if you
>>  > > were more than about 20-30 degrees banked, it would turn
>>  > > even steeper.
>>  > > Called spiral stability - I'm not sure I understand why
>>  > > that is desirable in
>>  > > a certified airplane.
>>  > >
>>  > > The tendency for an airplane to return to wings level is
>>  > > dihedral effect.
>>  > > The Velocity is supposed to be fairly good at trying to
>>  > > do this, although I
>>  > > haven't really tested this on my 173 Elite RG.  You
>>  > > wouldn't think the Velo
>>  > > would be as good as a C172, since the 172 is hanging
>>  > > under its wings - the
>>  > > Velo has mid wings, and they go straight out.  I guess
>>  > > the swept wings
>>  > > causes the dihedral effect.  I love the way mine flies,
>>  > > very stable for
>>  > > cross country and IFR.  And it handles well at low speed,
>>  > > on final.  Just
>>  > > lands fast like a canard.  Otherwise, GREAT airplane!
>>  > >
>>  > > Having the ailerons set at 1/2" down while centered
>>  > > sounds scary.  That
>>  > > would cause a pretty good pitch "down" effect.  Are you
>>  > > saying that your
>>  > > ailerons go to faired straight neutral while in the air?
>>  > > Sounds like
>>  > > something is giving too much slop in your aileron control
>>  > > linkages?
>>  > >
>>  > > My ailerons have one piece torque tubes - no connector
>>  > > near the aileron end.
>>  > > I don't see the slop or give that some folks say they see
>>  > > with the "off
>>  > > center" aluminum torque tube arrangement.  I can't see
>>  > > that it matters where
>>  > > the torque tube is mounted in relationship to the hinge
>>  > > line.  As long as
>>  > > the torque tube is attached in such a way that it points
>>  > > to the aileron bell
>>  > > crank at the root of the wing, I don't understand the
>>  > > "wrap-up" that you
>>  > > mention.
>>  > >
>>  > > Ronnie
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > ----- Original Message -----
>>  > > From: "Lynn Gallup" <LGallup at mn.rr.com>
>>  > > To: "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list"
>>  > > <reflector at tvbf.org>
>>  > > Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:17 PM
>>  > > Subject: REFLECTOR: Aileron self-centering
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > | Velo-people,
>>  > > | A while back I started a thread called "aileron
>>  > > stiffness". This really
>>  > > | related more to the degree of aileron self-centering
>>  > > following a turn than
>>  > > | to stiffness per se.  On my airplane I thought the
>>  > > ailerons displayed
>>  > > almost
>>  > > | no self-centering in flight and I attributed this to
>>  > > stiffness or friction
>>  > > | in the system.
>>  > > |
>>  > > | I noticed that on the ground the aileron control seemed
>>  > > fairly smooth and
>>  > > | easy compared to in-flight so I decided to reject the
>>  > > "stiffness and
>>  > > | friction" hypothesis and look elsewhere. I postulated
>>  > > that there might be
>>  > > | some kind of "slack" or "wrap-up" in the system due,
>>  > > possibly, to bending
>>  > > of
>>  > > | the aileron torque tubes because they are not attached
>>  > > at the center of
>>  > > | pivot of the ailerons. As an experiment, I adjusted the
>>  > > ailerons so they
>>  > > had
>>  > > | a half-inch of droop when centered. I felt this would
>>  > > torque-load the
>>  > > system
>>  > > | in flight and I should feel at least something
>>  > > different. I have now flown
>>  > > | the airplane about ten hours this way and pretty much
>>  > > put it through it's
>>  > > | paces. My feeling is that the change definitely helped
>>  > > but not enough.
>>  > > |
>>  > > | I believe the aileron droop idea is really a
>>  > > second-order fix, good enough
>>  > > | for an experiment but not the primary factor so I
>>  > > really don't want to
>>  > > | increase the droop;  I might break something - Like my
>>  > > head. So I am now
>>  > > | thinking about two things (1) replacing the aluminum
>>  > > aileron torque tubes
>>  > > | with steel and/or (2) installing universal joints where
>>  > > the tubes attach
>>  > > to
>>  > > | the ailerons.
>>  > > |
>>  > > | Have any of you had any experience with either of these
>>  > > ideas?
>>  > > |
>>  > > | Regards,
>>  > > | Lynn
>>  > > |
>>  > > | _______________________________________________
>>  > > | To change your email address, visit
>>  > > http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>  > > |
>>  > > | Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>  > > | user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>  > > | Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>  > > | Check old archives:
>>  > > http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > _______________________________________________
>>  > > To change your email address, visit
>>  > > http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>  > >
>>  > > Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>  > > user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>  > > Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>  > > Check old archives:
>>  > > http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>>  > >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > =====
>>  > James F. Agnew
>>  > Jim_Agnew_2 at Yahoo.Com
>>  > Tampa, FL
>>  > Velocity 173 Elite Aircraft Completed & Flying
>>  > _______________________________________________
>>  > To change your email address, visit
>>http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>  >
>>  > Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>  > user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>  > Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>  > Check old archives:
>>    
>>
>http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>  
>
>>  >
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>To change your email address, visit
>>    
>>
>http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>  
>
>>Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>  
>



More information about the Reflector mailing list