REFLECTOR:Re:Flight characteristics of a Canard
Scott
reflector@tvbf.org
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:19:30 -0700
Here's a response by Tom Staggs, a professional Aerobatic Canard pilot who
has done extensive flight testing of these airplanes as well. Notice the
very slight dig of the Velocity, "properly designed (such as one of Burt's
designs) ", a common feeling in the Rutan Purest crowd..
I trust Tom's opinion because he's been that and done there.
Scott,
First of all, never say 'never'....
Theoretically, if the plane is properly designed (such as one of Burt's
designs) and operated within the designed CG limit, what you say is pretty
much correct. The plane can stall, even the main wing, but there will be
enough static and dynamic stability built into the design that it will
recover.
Having said this, I can cite several instances where planes I flew (my
Long-EZ, a Cozy III I was test-flying for some folks, and a VEZ), all
exhibited the tendency to enter something resembling a 'Deep Stall', which
is characterized by a nose-high attitude, little or no airspeed indication,
and a rate of descent of 2-4,000 fpm. In all three planes, the CG was
within limits.
In the Long-EZ, I believe it was a combination of inverted flight (I was
performing a maneuver in an air show) when rain contamination of my GU
canard got me into an inverted deep stall. I fell about 800' before being
able to use my rudders to roll wings level.
In the Cozy, the area of the broadened fuselage moves the center of
projected area forward of the center of mass, so in very aggressive
maneuvering, it is possible to perform a maneuver I can best describe as
being like the 'Cobra' performed by some Russian fighters. Scary, but
recovers on its own.
Lastly, the VEZ was actually at a slightly aft CG (large engine) and felt
like it started to enter a deep stall as I performed some accelerated
stalls. I powered up, recovered, landed, and never flew that airframe again.
I hope this answers your question,
Tom Staggs
Long-EZ N13YV
EAA Flight Advisor