REFLECTOR: Picture held up

[Brian Michalk]

My sentiments.
I would like to reference the email with THREE attached pictures of the
trailing fence.

I personally have no objection to increasing the size.  I'm just trying to
protect those who have slow connections, but so far I'm not hearing anyone
say it's a bad idea.

 Brian Michalk  <http://www.michalk.com>
Life is what you make of it ... never wish you had done something.
Aviator, experimental aircraft builder, motorcyclist, SCUBA diver
musician, home-brewer, entrepreneur and mostly single


> -----Original Message-----
> From: reflector-admin@tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-admin@tvbf.org]On
> Behalf Of Al Gietzen
> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 4:34 PM
> To: reflector@tvbf.org
> Subject: RE: REFLECTOR: Picture held up
>
>
>
> Are there any reflectorites here on dialup or other expensive connection
> that would oppose a 120K limit on attachments?
>
>  Brian Michalk  <http://www.michalk.com>
>
> I have no problem with 120KB attachments, but there is rarely any reason
> to send something more than 60KB.  Anyone sending pics on the internet
> needs software that converts to JPEG, and allows you to size and/or crop
> an image.   Typically reducing the size to about 4 x 6", (maybe 400 x
> 600 pixels) gets you below about 40KB on a JPEG.
>
> Al
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector

Visit the gallery!  tvbf:jamaicangoose