REFLECTOR: Battery options

[Randy Monzelowsky]

Maybe I've been under my rock for too long..a Honda Starter on a Franklin?! 

Q: Is there any modification (to starter or block) necessary to make that
fitment?

What are the primary benefits.ie- better torque, higher rpm, reduced weight?

 

Randy C Monzelowsky  N97VE

Phone: (701)663-8815

FAX:  (701)663-8838

www.DakotaCaulking.com <http://www.dakotacaulking.com/> 

 

From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of WJ Wilbeck
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 4:15 PM
To: 'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list'
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Battery options

 

On my Franklin, Hot starts we iffy.  I changed to a Honda starter and it
starts great now.

 

WJ Wilbeck

620-727-3596

 

From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of Hiroo Umeno
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 1:29 PM
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
Subject: REFLECTOR: Battery options

 

Fellow builders,

 

I have two Odyssey PC680s in the nose of my plane wired in parallel.  While
this setup works for the most part, starting the big 6 cylinder Franklin can
be a bit tasking.

 

I am considering doing something about it when we take the plane apart for
condition inspection and upgrade next winter.  So.

 

.       Would it make sense to move the batteries to the rear bulkhead close
to CG assuming the W&B issue can be worked out in the nose?  This will
reduce the wire run length.

.       Would it make sense to keep the batteries where they are now in the
nose and add additional 0-gauge wires (and back) to reduce current loss?

 

I know that going to 24V system will give me less current to drive the
starter but that is a fairly extensive change on the rest of the aircraft
systems.

 

Any other ideas?

 

Hiroo

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20140211/8e9fc8cc/attachment-0001.html>