REFLECTOR: Performance
Dave Philipsen
velocity at davebiz.com
Fri May 10 02:04:02 CDT 2013
Wow! That is amazing! Did you also convert from a 4/2 exhaust to a
4/4? Is your new exhaust simply one pipe from each cylinder or exactly
what is the configuration?
I don't remember if it was a Velocity or a Cozy but I remember seeing a
photo of someone's plane with the exhausts being routed out to the
trailing edges of the wings. Does anyone else remember seeing that?
Dave Philipsen
Velocity STD FG
N83DP
On 5/9/2013 4:15 PM, Dave T Nelson wrote:
>
> Richard, I can't point at any NACA or other research, but I changed
> from a "straight out the bottom" to an enclosed aft firing exhaust on
> my 200 HP STD-RG. I picked up at least 10 knots, really more like 15.
> I did it because all of my EZ friends, and especially the guys I know
> that race, had done it and claimed great results.
>
> Clearly shooting the exhaust out the bottom creates a big plume of
> disturbed air... I've struggled as to exactly how the force of that
> "drag plume" is translated back to the aircraft... but it sure worked
> for me.
>
> Here's a picture of my exhaust. Yes, I do get soot on my three bladed
> prop. No, I've never seen any damage issue to the prop from the hot
> gas (after about 400 - 500 hours).
>
> /(See attached file: IMG_1042.jpg)/
>
> Dave
>
> Dave T. Nelson
> T/L 553-4327, Voice 507-253-4327, Fax 507-253-3648
> Program Director, ISC ECAT NPI & Test Engineering
>
>
> I still don't understand the drag mechanism for normal angle of
> exhaust being a drag.
> Does anyone know where I can find NACA or other research on this?
>
> On 5/9/2013 11:07 AM, Richard J. Gentil wrote:
>
> Geoff,
>
> If you make the exhaust change I would be very interested in your
> results since mine currently exit straight down.
>
> Richard
>
> Sent from my iPhone 5
>
> On May 8, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Geoff Gerhardt
> <_geoff.gerhardt at gmail.com_ <mailto:geoff.gerhardt at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Thanks - that was the insight I was looking for and what I
> suspected. I would actually prefer to have the normal,
> shorter wing - I'd love the 15kts in speed and would gladly
> live with a little higher stall speed.
>
> Now, given that, I wonder if there's anything I could do that
> could improve my performance. The two things that I'm
> considering are changing my exhaust config from exiting
> straight down to exiting inside the cowling at the prop. I've
> heard some folks state they have seen significant improvements
> with that mod. The other was an intake ram scoop - would that
> give me more MAP at altitude and a little more power?
>
> Thanks for all the performance comments/comparisons...keep
> them coming.
>
> Geoff
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Scott Baker
> <_scottb33333 at gmail.com_ <mailto:scottb33333 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I notice that several responders are giving numbers for a
> Velocity Standard RG, while Geoff's aircraft is a Velocity 173
> (aka LW 'Long Wing').
> Velocity Standard models, with their smaller wings and reduced
> drag, are faster than their 173 brethren ... by 15 knots on
> average (with comparable engines and propellers).
> The factory V173FG trainer is hard pressed to see 145KTAS in
> cruise. I think the RG version cruises between 155-160KTAS
> (about 15knots faster than the fixed gear model).
> These numbers are pretty close to what Geoff is reporting for
> his aircraft.
> Scott B.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20130510/2c5beb52/attachment.html>
More information about the Reflector
mailing list