REFLECTOR: Thrustline change

[Keith Hallsten]

Yes, that's true, too.

 

Keith

 

 

From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of steve korney
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 9:21 PM
To: Reflector Reflector
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Thrustline change

 


I thought the way the canard was set was to have a lot of angle of attack on
the canard relative to the main wing so it would stall first...



Steve 

  _____  

From: ljepstein at hotmail.com
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:58:49 -0400
To: reflector at tvbf.org
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Thrustline change

On a conventional aircraft, in order to lower the nose, you must increase
the lift generated by the elevator/aft wing, therefore increasing drag. The
opposite is true for a forward wing/elevator. Decreased lift lowers the nose
and less drag.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 5:20 PM, steve korney <s_korney at hotmail.com> wrote:


Richard...

I have a question...

In general...........Does it take more energy to keep the nose of a canard
aircraft down with elevator trim, or to keep the nose of a conventional
aircraft down with elevator trim...? 


Steve 

> From: richard at naples-air-center.com
> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:29:04 -0400
> To: reflector at tvbf.org
> Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Thrustline change
> 
> David,
> 
> Think of it as reflexing your Canard. That is very efficient since you are
removing lift and drag from the control surface. 
> 
> Richard
> 
> Sent from my iPhone 5
> 
> On Mar 29, 2013, at 1:29 PM, "David Ullman" <ullman at robustdecisions.com>
wrote:
> 
> > When I cruise with only me in the SEFG I have to put in 1/2 inch of down
> > trim (elevator up) or more. This is clearly inefficient. I already have
> > 18lb of lead in the nose and don't want to add more. A friend suggested
> > shimming the top of the engine mount for a little downward pitch moment.
I
> > sort of like the idea but am worried that it might increase my take off
> > distance as it will drive the canard downward a little. He thinks it may
> > help as the engine thrust line is slight more upward. 
> > 
> > Any thoughts or experiences?
> > 
> > 
> > David Ullman
> > N444DX
> > President EAA 292
> > 541-760-2338
> > david at davidullman.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
> > 
> > Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> > user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> > Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> > Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
> 
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html


_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector

Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html



_______________________________________________ To change your email
address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector Visit the
gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose Check new
archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail Check old archives:
http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20130329/f69d2c5c/attachment.html>