REFLECTOR: VG
Lou Stedman
stedmanlou at roadrunner.com
Fri Jan 6 18:23:59 CST 2012
I forgot about that article. My airplane is in the article. However, it never made the deep stall. Thank God.
From: Scott Derrick
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 4:56 PM
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: VG
I read the July 1991 Sport Aviation article again about deep stalls and at the end of the article it states
WING DESIGN CHANGE
Immediately following the deep stall
incident mentioned early in this report,
Dan Maher redesigned the Velocity
wing by extending the trailing edge and
changing the aft inboard camber
slightly, and he reports that recent tests
of the new wing installed on the prototype trailer-mounted airplane show
that there is no unrecoverable deep stall
with this new configuration. The outboard wing LE cuffs will therefore not
be required for kits now being shipped.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The Velocity kits preceding the
above change will receive leading edge
cuffs as tested on the fourth flight.
2. It is believed that the pitchups on
the fourth flight were caused by the
strake lift existing after main inboard
wing stall, which overpowered the pitchdown moment from the still-flying outboard wings; the pitchdown to controlled flight occurred when the strakes
stalled.
3. Further trailer testing should be
done to develop an understanding of
the reason for the low descent rate
existing in the deep stall condition. It is
possible that a very large, strong vortex
was formed above the wing which could
not be detected by surface tufting. It is
my understanding that Mr. Witold
Kasper has demonstrated this phenomenon in flight.
- James M. Patton, Jr.
Test Pilot
With no mention of the Vortilons, I must be wrong about there need for safety of flight. Sorry for crying wolf!
Scott
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: VG
From: Scott Derrick mailto:scott at tnstaafl.net
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list mailto:reflector at tvbf.org
Date: 01/06/2012 11:46 AM
I'm not sure why Duane said that.
During the main wing stall investigation when Maher still owned Velocity, he said that Vortilons significantly reduced the chance of encountering deep stall and recommended them on all airplanes in addition to the changes they made to the strake and reduced rear CG range.
Maybe The Swings changed something later that reduced that requirement? Maybe only STD size wings need them?
I had not heard they were no longer required and apologize if I was spreading miss-information. They are supposed make the ailerons more effective at low speeds, I don't know because I have never flown without them.
I have flown with and without VG's and they definitely increase aileron effectiveness and reduce takeoff and landing speeds.
Scott
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: VG
From: velocityoner at yahoo.com
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list mailto:reflector at tvbf.org
Date: 01/06/2012 11:13 AM
The factory doesn't have vortilons on their aircraft. My airplane has been flying for 19 years without them. Not to say that I wouldn't put them on but I know of other velocities without them as well. I have the short wing. I once asked Duane about adding them and he said they went needed. I have somewhere around 800 landings to date. I may try them one day along with TE Fences. It would be interesting to see how much difference they make.
Victor Taylor
N93DV
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 6, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Scott Derrick <scott at tnstaafl.net> wrote:
I think your confused. What was mounted on your Glastar where Vortilons, not VG's. We have Vortilons on the V's and only people with a death wish fly without them. VG's on the other hand are optional, but I think they are worth every penny and hassle.
Scott
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: VG
From: Peter Braswell <peter.braswell at gmail.com>
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list <reflector at tvbf.org>
Date: 01/06/2012 08:58 AM
All,
The VG's seem to be a bit of a pain to deal with. I was wondering about the tangible benefit they provide and are they worth the heart burn?
I had VG's on my Glastar. They were however just triangular shaped devices that were mounted just above the airfoil out on the leading edge and they roughly followed the curvature of the wing. There were two on each wing, one mounted about 3/4 outboard and the other right at the root. They were advertised to lower the stall speed and to help maintain aileron effectiveness at low airspeeds. I ended up removing the root mounted VG's to better seal the wing root area (the cabin was drafty) and I didn't notice one bit of difference in either handling or the stall speed.
Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's a Jungle Up There": www.zuluworks.com
Great Aviation Gear: www.sky-gadgets.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Scott Derrick <scott at tnstaafl.net> wrote:
I have CC I vg's on my plane. They are OK. They are sharp and care must be used when washing the plane. They also get brittle over time, they are not UV proof as advertised.
Barry Gibbons <gibbons at as.net> wrote:
I was looking at Velocity‘s store web site and they didn’t have the VG for the wings and canard. I found a place called CCI of New Jersey has any body used their VGs?
Barry
_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
--
All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen.
Ralph Waldo Emerson_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
--
Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind.
William Shakespeare
_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
--
Prayer is not to be used as a confessional, to cancel sin. Such an error would impede true religion. Sin is forgiven only as it is destroyed by Christ - Truth and Light.
Mary Baker Eddy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20120106/9c6f2402/attachment.htm>
More information about the Reflector
mailing list