REFLECTOR: Aileron Rigging (Reflexing)

John Dibble aminetech at bluefrog.com
Thu Apr 26 10:40:46 CDT 2012


Without knowing it, I think I've already done the testing for you.  When 
I bought my plane the ailerons were 1/4" up.  I flew that way several 
years with no problems.  However I had nothing to compare with.  Then 
after the discussion several months ago, I changed mine to 1/16" up.  
That resulted in a more sluggish response, but more stable tracking.  I 
think I picked up a few knots, which is contrary to what your article is 
saying.  I think Larry Coen's comments that a neutral position (when in 
flight) will give the least drag is the best explanation.  I see no 
concerns if you want to experiment  and position the ailerons up.  It's 
more responsive, which I like .  However I prefer the stability (and 
greater speed?) more.

John

On 4/26/2012 9:58 AM, Ron VelocityXLFG wrote:
> http://www.angelfire.com/on/dragonflyaircraft/reflexing.html 
> <http://www.angelfire.com/on/dragonflyaircraft/reflexing.html>
> I know there are people with way more understanding of this than me . 
> I only entertain the idea
> because the web sit speaks of gaining 10- 60 knots in theory . 
> Reflexing the ailerons
> would be a fairly easy  modification .  If you could gain this kind of 
> speed with the same HP
> and set the system up so as to remove the reflex of the ailerons as 
> the plane slows down why not
> give it a try.
> Yes deep stall is very possible and maybe the whole reason not to  do 
> this but what if you could
> rig the system to remove the reflex in the system quickly and would 
> also automatically removed
> the reflex  if the plane is under some predetermined speed. With a 
> gain of 10 knots with the same
> HP sounds real enticing.
> No I am not trying this just entertaining the idea. I do not own a 
> Parachute so I will only entertain the idea
> for now. Has any one looked into this and would like to share.
> Ron
> *From:* Alex Balic <mailto:velocity_pilot at verizon.net>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 9:27 PM
> *To:* 'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list' 
> <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>
> *Subject:* REFLECTOR: Aileron Rigging (was another Velocity in the air)
>
> Reflexing the ailerons will reduce drag- for a more detailed 
> explanation of why this is see this:
>
> http://www.angelfire.com/on/dragonflyaircraft/reflexing.html
>
> it uses a Dragonfly canard aircraft to illustrate the aerodynamics, 
> but it is the same with the Velocity.
>
> Having the ailerons drooped is like flying with flaps deployed all of 
> the time-
>
> *From:*reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] 
> *On Behalf Of *Scott Baker
> *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 6:34 PM
> *To:* Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
> *Subject:* Re: REFLECTOR: Another Velo in the air
>
> Looks like contributions to this discussion are dealing with two 
> issues ...
>
> the first deals with aileron balancing (trailing edge up is good; 
> trailing edge down is bad) ...
>
> the other deals with aileron rigging (trailing edge down offers better 
> stable handling; trailing edge up offers lively roll response).
>
> Scott B.
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>
>     *From:*Michael Watson <mailto:mikewatsspg at gmail.com>
>
>     *To:*Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
>     <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>
>
>     *Sent:*Friday, December 02, 2011 6:37 PM
>
>     *Subject:*Re: REFLECTOR: Another Velo in the air
>
>     Mine has been down a 1/4 inch for over twelve years and I have had
>     no problems with stability.
>     When the test pilot came up from Velocity to do my first flight,
>     the first thing he had me change
>     was to move them from level with the wings to 1/4 inch down. He
>     claimed that if they were up,
>     the leading edge would protrude below the wing and cause yawing.
>
>     Joel who owned a XL was having problems with unstable landings. I
>     re-adjusted his ailerons
>     to 1/4 inch down and that solved his problem.
>
>     John, I think you are referring to initial balancing of the
>     ailerons without the cables connected
>
>     On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Scott Derrick <scott at tnstaafl.net
>     <mailto:scott at tnstaafl.net>> wrote:
>
>     Mine are rigged up also, per two different velocity factory a&p's
>
>
>
>     aminetech at bluefrog.com <mailto:aminetech at bluefrog.com> wrote:
>
>     Mine are both 1/4" UP with no issues.  Rigging them both up was
>     mentioned several years ago (see below).  Should I change them?
>
>     Subject:
>                 Re: REFLECTOR:AILERON CONTROL FORCE
>            Date:
>                 Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:57:26 -0500
>           From:
>                 "Scott Baker" <sbakr at comcast.net
>     <mailto:sbakr at comcast.net>>
>        Reply-To:
>     reflector at tvbf.org <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>
>             To:
>     <reflector at tvbf.org <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>>
>     References:
>                 1 , 2
>
>
>     I wanted to offer a clarification to an earlier post where I said ...
>
>     "How are the ailerons balanced?  Do they droop below the
>     trailing edge of the wings and is their movement almost
>     'frictionless'?"
>
>     When properly balanced, the trailing edge of the ailerons should rise
>     slightly above the trailing edge of the wings.  I was wanting to say
>     that IF
>     the ailerons on Tom's aircraft drooped below the trailing edge of the
>     main
>     wings, then this is a problem.  Besides inviting flutter, an aileron
>     that is
>     not balanced may also contribute to greater stick forces - which is
>     what we
>     are trying to trouble shoot from Tom's message.
>
>     Scott B.
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     To change your email address, visit
>     http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>     Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery <http://www.tvbf.org/gallery>
>     user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>     Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>     <http://www.tvbf.org/pipermail>
>     Check old archives:
>     http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>
>     --- john at velocityaircraft.com <mailto:john at velocityaircraft.com>
>     wrote:
>
>     From: "John Abraham" <john at velocityaircraft.com
>     <mailto:john at velocityaircraft.com>>
>     To: "'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list'"
>     <reflector at tvbf.org <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>>
>     Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Another Velo in the air
>     Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 07:49:54 -0500
>
>     Dave,
>
>     SE and XL's should have ailerons drooped 1/8" down.  What your
>     pilot was experiencing was the leading edge of the ailerons
>     grabbing the air and pulling on the stick.  You can't find the
>     centering point very well with this.  The other thing to look at
>     is if the leading edge has any sharp edges on it.  You want the
>     leading edge to be rounded so it doesn't grab the air.
>
>     John
>
>     *From:*reflector-bounces at tvbf.org
>     <mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org>
>     [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org
>     <mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org>] *On Behalf Of *Dennis Martin
>     *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2011 10:54 PM
>     *To:* Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
>     *Subject:* Re: REFLECTOR: Another Velo in the air
>
>     I hired John Abraham, Velocity Chief Pilot, to conduct my first
>     flights. He and I spent a couple hours doing fine tuning on the
>     aileron and elevator rigging. I think you should talk with John
>     about your dutch roll and any fine tuning you might do to make
>     sure the ailerons are rigged properly. I also had some nose wheel
>     shimmy - we kept tightening the castle nut until it went away. We
>     went well past the 15 lbs recommended - perhaps as much as 20-25
>     lbs. on my fixed gear.
>
>     Good luck - I'm sure the factory team can help you figure it out.
>
>     Dennis
>
>     On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:42 PM, David Ullman
>     <ullman at robustdecisions.com <mailto:ullman at robustdecisions.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>     N-444DX, an SEFG took to the air for its first flight today after
>     5+ years
>     of work.  With Jorge Bujanda's flight,  that makes two planes this
>     week.  I
>     hired a test pilot, Robin Reid (30,000+ hours in over 300 types of
>     aircraft,
>     owner of a VarEZ for 5 years, and he flew a Velocity (Thanks Mel
>     Rudin) just
>     two weeks ago) and I am glad I did.  Most everything worked well
>     which was a
>     relief since I had been concerned about the engine that I built from a
>     basket case, brakes heating, and nose wheel shimmy, but none of
>     these were a
>     problem.  But,I do seem to have a roll control problem that I will
>     work out
>     over the next couple of days (starting with a call to Velocity
>     tomorrow AM).
>
>
>     It seems that right after take-off Robin experienced a severe
>     Dutch roll
>     problem whenever he input any aileron control.  This seemed to
>     increase with
>     speed so he went around a big circle with rudder only and the ailerons
>     locked neutral. He kept the speed under 120kts and landed at about
>     100kts.
>     After taxiing it bask to the hangar I measured the following:
>
>     If I push down and let go, both ailerons fare even with the wings.
>     If I push up on one, it will stay up due to friction about .35"
>     above the
>     wing when the other is even with its wing.
>     If I push up hard on one I can flex it to .550"
>
>     The reason for this test is the thought that the air loads are
>     pushing them
>     both up, but this does not explain the Dutch roll (maybe?).
>
>     I measured the incidence of both wings at five different locations
>     with an
>     angle measuring device and found that most values were within a
>     degree of
>     each other (within the tolerance of the device).
>
>     I had a colleague put a resisting force on the ailerons and moved the
>     control stick and all seemed normal.
>
>     One thing I haven't checked is the gap between the wing and the
>     aileron.
>     This was on spec early on, but there has been paint and other
>     finishing
>     since then.  I will measure that tomorrow.
>
>     Anyone else have a Dutch Roll problem?  I am calling Velocity
>     tomorrow AM to
>     get their input on this, but other ideas are more than welcome.
>
>     David Ullman
>     N-444DX Velocity
>     EAA 292 President
>     david at davidullman.com <mailto:david at davidullman.com>
>     541-754-3609
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     To change your email address, visit
>     http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>     Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery <http://www.tvbf.org/gallery>
>     user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>     Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>     <http://www.tvbf.org/pipermail>
>     Check old archives:
>     http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     All the best,
>     Dennis
>
>     _______________________________________________ To change your
>     email address, visit
>     http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector Visit the gallery!
>     www.tvbf.org/gallery <http://www.tvbf.org/gallery> user:pw =
>     tvbf:jamaicangoose Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>     <http://www.tvbf.org/pipermail> Check old archives:
>     http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     To change your email address, visit
>     http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>     Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery <http://www.tvbf.org/gallery>
>     user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>     Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>     <http://www.tvbf.org/pipermail>
>     Check old archives:
>     http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Mike W.
>     1997 Velocity Elite RG
>     Franklin /IVO Electric CS
>     Dual GRT EFIS HX Synthetic Vision
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     To change your email address, visit
>     http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>     Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
>     user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>     Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>     Check old archives:
>     http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit 
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20120426/9254d19a/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Reflector mailing list