REFLECTOR: IFR GPS

nmflyer1 at aol.com nmflyer1 at aol.com
Tue May 31 10:39:35 CDT 2011


Ahh.. There is the catch. Thanks!  Since I'm not yet signed off, I didn't have that FAA Inverse Loophole :) 

Kurt 






-----Original Message-----
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures at cox.net>
To: 'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list' <reflector at tvbf.org>
Sent: Tue, May 31, 2011 9:36 am
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: IFR GPS



Thanks, Glenn.
 
The operating limitations clearly state:
 
-        After completion of phase 1 testing, unless appropriately equipped for night and/or instrument flight in accordance with 91.205, this aircraft is to be operated under VFR, day only.
 
Al
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On Behalf Of Glenn Babcock
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 3:09 AM
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: IFR GPS
 

The short answer is that the FAA puts the sections of parts 91 and 43 that they want you to comply with in your operating limits when they issue your airworthiness certificate. 

 

If the operating limits say "day VFR only" then you can't fly IFR. If you tell the FAA you want night or IFR then they will specify 91.205 in the operating limits for these types of flight. 

 

This is also where the conditional inspection requirement is documented, since part 43 doesn't otherwise apply. 


Regards,

 

Glenn

 

 



On May 31, 2011, at 1:48 AM, "Al Gietzen" <ALVentures at cox.net> wrote:


 

FAR 91.205 is for :

 

"Sec. 91.205

Powered civil aircraft with standard category U.S. airworthiness certificates: Instrument and equipment requirements."

 

We have Experimental certificates, Not standard. Or.. did I miss some small print? 
 
Just a note. You are the factory. You decide what makes your plane IFR, not the FAA. 
 
Hum-m-m; well, I assumed that 91.205 applied; but this sufficiently muddys the water. What, then are the equipment and instrumentation requirements for ‘Experimental’ aircraft – or is ‘experimental actually a subcategory of  ‘Standard’ Category?
 
Al





 

-----Original Message-----
From: Al Gietzen <ALVentures at cox.net>
To: 'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list' <reflector at tvbf.org>
Sent: Mon, May 30, 2011 1:35 pm
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: IFR GPS


 


Just a note. You are the factory. You decide what makes your plane IFR, not the FAA. 



Richard

 

Well, not quite; it needs to meet the FAR 91.205 requirements.

 

Al



 



_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
 
Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html




_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector

Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html



_______________________________________________
o change your email address, visit http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
ser:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
heck new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
heck old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20110531/6c1067cc/attachment.htm>


More information about the Reflector mailing list