REFLECTOR: Velocity SE wing vs. Long-EZ wing

[Andy Millin]

Velocity went through an extensive test and development program to remove
deep stall.  The result was a modified wing shape for the Velocity.
 
Andy
 
  _____  

From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of John Tvedte
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 11:23 AM
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Velocity SE wing vs. Long-EZ wing


It would be interesting to know if it is based on the GU vs Roncz canard 

  _____  

From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of Scott Derrick
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 10:15 AM
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Velocity SE wing vs. Long-EZ wing


As far as I know the the main wing airfoil is the same on all the canards,
EZ, Cozy, Velocity...

I'm not sure about the canard airfoil..

Scott

Jon Matcho wrote: 

Richard J. Gentil wrote:



  

You will find the Cozy III will have the same wing as the Long EZ.

The Cozy IV and the Velo SE are a larger wing then the Long EZ.

    



The Cozy IV has the same exact airfoil as the Cozy III and Long-EZ, but

the mounting has been changed with the Cozy IV.  I'm wondering (for

historical purposes) if the same is true with the early/first Velocity

aircraft designs -- the ones that evolved from the Long-EZ design.

Anyone know?



Jon



 

Jon Matcho

Building Cozy Mark IV+

www.canardzone.com/members/JonMatcho

www.canardzone.com/forum 

 

 

_______________________________________________

To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector



Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery

user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose

Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail

Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html







  


-- 



-

    The only security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion
cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed. The agitation it
produces must be submitted to. It is necessary, to keep the waters pure.



    Thomas Jefferson to Lafayette, 1823. ME 15:491 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20061206/edc61508/attachment.htm