REFLECTOR: Take Off Performance
Pat Shea
xl340hp at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 11 22:50:02 CDT 2006
Hmmm,
Tom's main position was that the 6 cylinder V didn't
match up performance and capacity wise to the Cirrus
22. Brett countered that with "book" numbers from both
companies just as reference. The fact that published
numbers are usually fantasy in the real world (whether
from Cessna, Piper, Lancair, Glasair, Velocity,
Cirrus...) was not Tom's or Brett's point.
You are literally splitting hairs trying to compare
the Velocity XL to the Cirrus 22 based on performance
and/or capacity numbers - using either book or real
word data.
Btw, I've always contended on that this board that
listening the the "been there, done that" crowd the
hardest as at least short sighted and at most elitist.
But that's just me...
Pat - XLRG that cruises over 15KTAS faster than any
Cirrus 22 (been there, done that)
--- HYTEC45 at aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 4/10/2006 11:42:45 A.M. Pacific
> Standard Time,
> xl340hp at yahoo.com writes:
>
> Talk about mixing and matching info...
>
>
>
>
> The intent of my post regarding my STD-RG was in
> reference to Brett's
> argument being based solely on "published specs",
> not flying yet, and questioning
> someone who has tested both aircraft. I pointed
> out in my post that my
> aircraft did not meet up to the "published" specs
> from the factory. I learned
> this from flying my machine over the years. I
> don't think that I compared my
> STD-RG to a SR22. Did I?? I think I compared it
> to a EZ, not a SR22. My
> point being that comparing based on published
> numbers is not the real world. I
> will always listen to people that have "been there,
> done that" the hardest.
>
> TEC
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the Reflector
mailing list