REFLECTOR: Take Off Performance

[steve korney]

I have to agree with TEC... My std V with the same engine has about the same 
performance... We flew together on one occasion and there wasn't more then a 
couple of knots difference between us... I don't get the advertised 
specifications either... I have a mt hydralic prop and he had a fixed pitch 
prop... Biggest difference was take-off performance... His was a little 
faster in cruise...

Best... Steve



----Original Message Follows----
From: HYTEC45 at aol.com
Reply-To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list <reflector at tvbf.org>
To: reflector at tvbf.org
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Take Off Performance
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:14:58 EDT


In a message dated 4/10/2006 11:42:45 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
xl340hp at yahoo.com writes:

Talk  about mixing and matching info...




The intent of my post regarding my STD-RG was in reference to  Brett's
argument being based solely on "published specs", not flying  yet, and 
questioning
someone who has tested both aircraft.   I pointed  out in my post that my
aircraft did not meet up to the "published" specs from  the factory.  I 
learned
this from flying my machine over the  years.  I don't think that I compared 
my
STD-RG to a SR22.  Did  I??  I think I compared it to a EZ, not a SR22.  My
point  being that comparing based on published numbers is not the real  
world.  I
will always listen to people that have "been there, done that"  the hardest.

TEC


_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit 
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector

Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html