REFLECTOR: speed brake ramblings
Jim Sower
canarder at frontiernet.net
Tue Sep 6 23:22:58 CDT 2005
I've already got a 3-pos UP-OFF-MomentaryDOWN switch for my belly
board. All I need to do is beef it up a bit and I'll be there. NO
extra wire, technology, transducers, failure modes.
I like it simple ... Jim S.
michalk wrote:
> Right.
> But in my last paragraph I addressed your point. A DPDT switch would
> be needed, increasing the complexity. The speedbrake system might
> behave something like this, using a DPDT switch, wired such that one
> end reversed the polarity:
>
> case1: 0 to 75lbf: switch is engaged such that correct polarity is
> applied.
>
> case2: 75 to 100lbf: switch disconnects power to speedbrake. Of
> course what happens if you want to retract?
>
> case3: over 100lbf, the switch reverses the polarity. But what
> happens if you are commanding a retraction? It would go the wrong way.
>
> Like I said, the SPST is easiest, the DPDT auto-retract would take
> more thought.
>
> Jim Sower wrote:
>
>> But it wouldn't prevent you from over speeding the speed brake if it
>> were already deployed, or retract it automatically when limits were
>> exceeded?
>>
>> michalk wrote:
>>
>>> The diode would allow you to retract the speedbreak if the cutout
>>> switch were engaged.
>>>
>>> Jim Sower wrote:
>>>
>>>> <<flip the switch to extend the board, and let the cutout switch
>>>> decide when to extend it some more What would happen if you were
>>>> cruising at low IAS (say at 15k'), extended the board, dumped the
>>>> nose and accelerated to some point beyond the limit? Sounds like
>>>> your scheme would prevent you from extending at excessive speed,
>>>> but not be able to retract it if the speed became excessive after
>>>> it was already extended.
>>>> Am I reading you right? ... Jim S.
>>>>
>>>> michalk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Incrementally extending...
>>>>>
>>>>> I was just thinking about this on your first post.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems it would be quite simple to add a force actuated switch
>>>>> that would not exceed some limit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not remember what the current actuators are rated for, but
>>>>> let's assume they are 100lbs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Make a collar that fits around the keel end of the actuator, with
>>>>> a spring with the appropriate K factor to move .25 inches when
>>>>> 75lbs is applied. Put a switch in series with the actuator, with
>>>>> a diode so that the switch is bypassed if you want to retract
>>>>> while the cutout switch is engaged. Normal operation would bypass
>>>>> the diode (no voltage drop), when the cutout switch is not engaged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Want to go down? just flip the switch to extend the board, and let
>>>>> the cutout switch decide when to extend it some more. Just don't
>>>>> exceed the limits by increasing your airspeed.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suppose one could get fancier with a DPDT switch that would
>>>>> retract it if the forces get too high, but I haven't put enough
>>>>> brain cells into that problem.
>>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
More information about the Reflector
mailing list