REFLECTOR: Cruise speed "speed brake"

Kufalk kufalk at wi.rr.com
Mon Sep 5 15:18:04 CDT 2005


Terry wrote...   "Another thought only, how about a split rudder like the
B-727."


Don't all canard pushers already have split rudders?

If you want to slow down from cruise speed without reducing power, why not
just press both rudders at the same time?

Darrell



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Miles" <terrence_miles at hotmail.com>
To: "'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list'" <reflector at tvbf.org>
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 6:32 AM
Subject: RE: REFLECTOR: Cruise speed "speed brake"


> Chuck,
>
> You can add me to the list of interested parties.  Here is all I have.
> In a brief and non-technical exchange w/ Scott Baker on this topic back
> about 6 months ago, comments expressed at that time were that there was
> a general safety concern about the panel coming off at higher airloads
> and going into the prop.  So a conservative speed limit was established
> and no testing was done above that speed.  And further there was no
> interest in incremental deployment angles.   Another thought only, how
> about a split rudder like the B-727.  Only this one would split and the
> low half both LH and RH would deflect into the slip stream.  The problem
> solved is not it out of the prop track, but the problem created is the
> deflection is way to far from centerline in the event of assym
> deployment malfunctions.  Good luck with this.  Keep us posted.
>
> Terry
> XL-RG with a SB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
> Behalf Of Chuck Harbert
> Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 3:54 AM
> To: reflector at tvbf.org
> Subject: REFLECTOR: Cruise speed "speed brake"
>
>
> Scott, I too have wondered if there was a way to install a high speed
> speed
> brake like the one on the Mooney 201 that pops up on the upper surface
> of
> the wing to kill the lift. It was great to get down in a hurry without
> puting the engine at idle. I wondered if you could install this
> electrically
> activated "fence" at the outboard edge of the strake in the wing bolt
> cavity, or inside the wing attached to the spar? They're not that large
> as I
> recall. They fail safe in the down position and have a warning light
> when
> deployed, as I recall.
>
> I think that this might be a better way because it kills lift, rather
> than
> just dirtying up the plane, and possibly making it unstable. I have the
> underbelly speed brake in my RG and it definetely works well for
> landing,
> but I'd love to have a real speed brake. I'll try to get a look at the
> Mooney's speed brake and send everybody the info.
>
> Chuck H
>
>
> -------------------------
> Scott Derrick wrote:
>
> > I think the standard speed brake is limited to 120 knot extension
> > speed.  Which limits its uses to in the pattern.
> >
> > Has anybody experimented with beefing it up to allow higher speed
> > extensions?  Like 175 knots?  This would make it a true speed brake.
> >
> > I would like something I could deploy at cruise to enable a cruise
> > speed descent without shock cooling the engine.
> >
> > What would you think would be needed to do this?  bigger hinges?
> > bigger actuator?  carbon fiber door?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery!  www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html



More information about the Reflector mailing list