REFLECTOR: Oil lines and ground wire.
Scott Derrick
scott at tnstaafl.net
Sat Sep 3 21:11:19 CDT 2005
That's very revealing...
thanks,
Scott
Gary T. Ciampa wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I am *not* the builder of my 173 FG, but in speaking with the builder,
> the original plans called for the oil supply and return in the same
> duct. He ran into high oil temperature problems and re-routed one of
> the lines down the co-pilot side. The oil temperature problems were
> corrected with the modification.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Gary
>
>> As far as running the lines in separate ducts it only helps by
>> preventing
>> the return oil being heated by the in-coming oil, so separating (or
>> insulating) them in the same is just as good. If you have outside air
>> flowing through the ducts, you can get some additional cooling, but
>> that has
>> some additional issues. The high pressure hose that is already in
>> there has
>> walls that are somewhat insulating; and a good steel-braid covered line
>> could be more reliable than solid aluminum (not subject to vibration
>> fatigue).
>>
>>
>> FWIW,
>>
>>
>>
>> Al
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Scott Derrick
>> Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 7:04 AM
>> To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
>> Subject: REFLECTOR: Oil lines and ground wire.
>>
>>
>>
>> My plane came with high pressure hoses for oil lines. Both ran in the
>> pilot side duct. I noticed that the manual calls for 1/2 " aluminum
>> lines. I was considering replacing the high pressure rubber/steel flex
>> lines with aluminum. Much lighter and smaller, those hydraulic lines
>> are huge and heavy.
>>
>>
>>
>> I was also considering running one up the pilot side and the other down
>> the copilot side to take advantage of the additional cooling benefits.
>> Has anybody done the comparison of running both in one duct and one in
>> each to see if there really is an advantage?
>>
>>
>>
>> Then I got to thinking about using the oil lines for my ground return
>> path from the battery to the engine? Aluminum is a pretty good
>> conductor, and having two lines would seem to provide a substantial
>> return path if I bonded both tubes at both ends?
>>
>>
>> Anybody do this?
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> To change your email address, visit
>> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>
More information about the Reflector
mailing list