REFLECTOR: Vortilions and/or VG's?

Greg Poole gpoole at zeta.org.au
Tue Jul 19 20:54:18 CDT 2005


Sure would be interested to see some pictures of tufts on various wing
combos at various speeds with / without VGs, Vortilons & lower winglets.
Anybody got a camera, some sticky tape and some wool thread?

 

Greg in Sydney

 

-----Original Message-----
From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Wednesday, 20 July 2005 10:53 AM
To: 'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list'
Subject: RE: REFLECTOR: Vortilions and/or VG's?

 

 

VGs energize the boundary layer and keep it attached longer and so delay 

the onset of stall. I've never heard of them doing anything measurable 

to inhibit spanwise flow. Vortilons OTOH were put there specifically to 

inhibit spanwise flow and are most active on the lower (high pressure) 

wing surface. I don't know how they delay boundary layer separation 

except as an incidental benefit of reduced spanwise flow.

 

IIRC vortilons and VGs pretty much address different issues ... Jim S.

 

I'll respectfully disagree on this one.  Tuft testing by the guys here in
the San Diego EZ-squadron (on both Vari-EZ and Long-EZ) found that the ONLY
span-wise flow that showed up was on the upper surface of the wing, under
where the flow had separated at high AOA.  It would begin inboard near the
fuselage, and spread outward (and thicken) as AOA increased.  

 

I also recall reading (I don't know where) that the reason Rutan added the
vortilons was to create vortices OVER the wing at high AOA to provide better
aileron authority (presumable because it inhibited span-wise flow near the
trailing edge which 'masked' the ailerons).

 

I think it reasonable to extrapolate that behavior to the Velocity wing.

 

Al

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20050720/4b0639d1/attachment.htm


More information about the Reflector mailing list