REFLECTOR: Limitations to the limitations

Terry Miles terrence_miles at hotmail.com
Mon Dec 12 06:36:37 CST 2005


"uncle"    Good luck to you, Al  Keep your ducks in a row.  Sounds like
you do.
Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org] On
Behalf Of Al Gietzen
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:24 AM
To: 'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list'
Subject: RE: REFLECTOR: Limitations to the limitations



Truth be told a Vne pointer should move

with shifts in density altitude, and not be a painted red mark on a dial

face.  Published airspeed limits are really TAS limits which are

modified by the manuafacturer with a compensation factor for indicated

airspeed application by the pilot.      

 

The TAS formula must account for density (or Rho) in the equation:   Q

(dynamic pressure) equals 1/2 Rho(density altitude) times velocity

squared.  TAS is what your airplane feels and responds to.  200 IAS at

5000 and 200 IAS at 200 are not the same real speeds.  Vne is a TAS

limit not an IAS limit, most days, the higher you go the bigger airspeed

error due to deviation error in RHO from actual back to standard day.

 

Fortunately modern panel equipment does the calculation for you, and
gives a continuous readout of TAS.  Both my EFIS system and engine
monitor display TAS.

 

  ALSO PLEASE

REMEMBER the formula calls for velocity squared, which means that

unexpected 10 knot vertical shear is really 100 units of difference.

Not 10

 

True, it goes as the square, but that 100 units of difference has to be
compared to the forward velocity squared as well; which at 200 kt is
40,000. 

 

So it seems that all we know is that there is a potentially destructive
limit out there somewhere, but we don't know where it is.  And that it
best be determined by analysis or in a wind tunnel.  However, current
experience suggests that it is somewhere beyond 200 kts IAS; and
possibly beyond 230 - 250 KTAS if everything is properly balanced and
rigged. (Seem about right?)

 

Catto's analysis says my plane could go 228 kts WOT, level flight, at
sea level on a standard day (IAS = TAS).  With a normally aspirated
engine, I should likely be OK at any altitude in level flight.  I'll
just have to watch the speed (TAS) in a descent.

 

Al

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20051212/1ea6a2a1/attachment.htm


More information about the Reflector mailing list