REFLECTOR: RE: asymmetric fuel feed
Chuck Jensen
cjensen at dts9000.com
Wed Sep 29 13:22:46 CDT 2004
Larry,
Your point is not just well taken, but even better, well-proven. Even the
IO-540 on takeoff won't gobble quite that much fuel.
My earlier reference regarding concern about adequacy of fuel flow through a
single, 3/8" line was from a somewhat impeachable source, who was quoting
another source...who had once dated Carmen Electra's, sister's cousin.
When I balance the quality of information from the two sources, you may know
your's is somewhat weightier. Are there any other data points out there
showing adequate fuel flow through a 3/8" line?
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: reflector-bounces at tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org]On
Behalf Of Laurence Coen
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 11:51 AM
To: Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list
Subject: Re: asymmetric fuel feed was Re: REFLECTOR: Fuel Shutoffs
Scott,
I agree with your statements regarding asymmetric flow. As a point of
interest, fuel flow problems due to leaking fuel caps are not unique to the
Velocity. I have a friend with a Debonair that had a bad "O" ring on the
left tank. He pulled enough of a vacuum to collapse the fuel bladder. This
in turn held the fuel sender float up, indicating 3/4 full when the tank was
empty.
As to the fuel flow being marginal with the standard venting system I will
pass along the results of some tests I ran. I have a standard RG with 3/8"
fuel lines and both tanks and the sump vented from a common manifold. I
have a carbureted Franklin engine. I disconnected the fuel line at the
carburetor. This was to insure that I was indeed measuring fuel delivered
to the engine with any restrictions to flow still in place. I delivered
fuel from the left tank and the lines from the right tank plugged. Ten
gallons in the left tank plus the sump (2.4 gal usable). I ran the electric
(Faucet) fuel pump and measured flow with my fuel flow meter. Initial flow
was 33.4 gal/hr and dropped to 30.5 gal/hr just before the pump ran dry.
The Faucet pump is rated at 30 gal/hr. The fuel totalizer indicated 12.4
gal total. This shows that you can get at least 30 gal/hr from a single
tank till the system runs bone dry. I see nothing marginal about that.
Larry Coen
SE/RG Franklin
N136LC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Derrick" <scott at tnstaafl.net>
To: "Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list" <reflector at tvbf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 6:07 PM
Subject: asymmetric fuel feed was Re: REFLECTOR: Fuel Shutoffs
> As I understand it, if you use the standard vent system of all tanks and
> sump tied into one vent line and your lines are unobstructed there are
> only two reasons for asymmetric fuel flow.
>
> 1. leaking fuel cap. the low pressure over the cap pulling air out of the
> tank. Get a new O ring or use fuel valve lube on the O ring to cure.
>
> 2.) Your airplane is skidding/slipping when in straight flight, ie not
> trimmed with the ball in the center. This is the most common reason.
> Fix the skid by adjusting the correct rudder outboard and the tanks will
> drain evenly within a couple gallons.
>
> stepping on the fuller tank with the same rudder for a short period will
> equalize the tanks,
> adding more valves and lights to fail is solving the symptom, not the
> problem......
>
> Scott
>
> At 11:06 PM 9/27/2004, you wrote:
>>If you don't vent the sump, the [marginal] gravity feed will be enhanced
>>by the fuel pump sucking the fuel out of the strakes into the sump. That
>>said, if you have assymmetric feeding of the strakes (a common occurrence
>>in these airplanes) once one tank gets empty, the sump will vent through
>>that strake vent and the strake that still has fuel will have only gravity
>>feed (which it has demonstrated is not working for it very well)
>>available. Isolation valves would solve that problem.
>>
>><... a turn the wrong direction on take-off (away from the fuel outlet)
>>could all contribute to less than adequate fuel flow ...>
>> Of course if you're in balanced flight (ball centered) the fuel has no
>> way of knowing you're turning so fuel flow would not be affected.
>>
>>I had assymmetric fuel transfer from the strakes to the sump for the
>>LONGEST time. I tried everything (except 1/2" lines) to no avail.
>>Finally solved the problem with electric "de-selection" valves that light
>>a LED on the panel when they are closed.
>>
>>If you vent your sump, all bets are off .... Jim S.
>>
>>
>>
>>Chuck Jensen wrote:
>>>Regarding a dual fuel shutoff, I understand there was some work/testing
>>>done on this years ago that raises an issue that is worth thinking about.
>>>It seems Velo (or someone) did flow tests from a single tank (with a low
>>>level of fuel in it) through the 3/8" fuel line and found the flow rate
>>>was marginally greater than the expected fuel consumption of an IO-540
>>>engine at max power. Given that some installations are non-standard and
>>>less than optimal, there was thought that with low fuel, a turn the wrong
>>>direction on take-off (away from the fuel outlet) could all contribute to
>>>less than adequate fuel flow unless both tanks were feeding. Since then,
>>>most have gone to 1/2" fuel lines, which should resolve the flow capacity
>>>from each tank--but not the exposed outlet from a flight turn.
>>>
>>>So, 1) I don't know if there is anything to it!, 2) on the side of
>>>caution, item #86 on the checklist would be to confirm both tanks are on
>>>line. With all that said, I wish I had dual isolation valves!
>>>
>>>Chuck
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: <mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org>reflector-bounces at tvbf.org
>>>[mailto:reflector-bounces at tvbf.org]On Behalf Of v350tx
>>>Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 8:31 PM
>>>To: <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>reflector at tvbf.org
>>>Subject: REFLECTOR: Fuel Shutoffs
>>>
>>>I have run into more than case when I wish I had put individual fuel
>>>shut-offs in each tank. I have one that shuts off the fuel after the
>>>sump tank, but if you have a leak in the sump tank or any of its fittings
>>>individual shut-offs would be handy. Dave Bertram ( hop to have my velo
>>>V-8 flying in a couple of weeks.)
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>To change your email address, visit
>>http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>>
>>Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
>>user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>>Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>>Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
> "Those who sacrifice freedom to get security, deserve neither."
> - Benjamin Franklin
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
> user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
> Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
> Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
_______________________________________________
To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
More information about the Reflector
mailing list