REFLECTOR: Engine Selection
J.P. Brooks
jp211 at comcast.net
Thu Jun 17 12:59:58 CDT 2004
most efficient blade would be a single blade with a counter-weight.....yes?
At 10:43 AM 6/17/2004, you wrote:
>To each his own. You can always go faster with a bigger engine, but to me
>the weight and fuel consumption penalty for anything over 200 hp in a
>plane this size isn't worth it. That's just me. A lot of guys like to
>build the biggest, baddest airplane they can. I love it. More power to
>them (literally.) It takes all kinds of people to make up a world. I'm
>one of those "less is more", "think smarter not harder" kind of guys. I'm
>shooting for 180 mph and 25 mpg at 9,000 feet with my top door, short
>wing, fixed main gear, retractable nose gear Velocity.
>
>I'm disappointed to hear that propellers are not more efficient at lower
>RPMs. I was hoping that extra efficiency would give my diesel a little
>free speed boost.
>
>Doug
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:ALVentures at cox.net>Al Gietzen
>To: <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>'Velocity Aircraft Owners and Builders list'
>Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 11:22 AM
>Subject: RE: REFLECTOR: Engine Selection
>
>Just a couple of comments on this power, efficiency and speed
>thing. Torque is a measure of force; HP is a measure of work; force times
>time or acting through a distance. So it is the HP that does the
>job. Hp is simply torque times rpm. You can have high torque a lower rpm
>but if it gives you the same HP youve gained nothing; unless the prop was
>more efficient at lower rpm. I thought this was true as well until I
>studied some prop performance charts and found it wasnt true.
>
>
>
>160; 180; or 200hp IMHO, these are all low for a fixed gear
>173. Getting 161 mph at 5500 ft with 160 hp translates to 173 mph with
>200hp (remember; speed goes as the cube root of power). Thats 153
>kts. Hardly impressive.
>
>
>
>Al
>
>
>
>Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Engine Selection
>
>
>
>Plenty of power. He's got a 173 RG. The Velocity was originally designed
>for 160 hp. The DH180A4 is 180 hp up to 18,000 feet. The DH200A4 is 200
>hp at 18,000 ft. Plus, the diesel has better torque at lower RPMs than a
>Lycoming, and propellers are more efficient at lower RPMs. Plus it weighs
>less if you take into account that it is 30% more fuel efficient, so you
>don't need to carry as much fuel weight to get the same range. A DH160V4
>is in the factory's test airplane. With the 160 hp engine they clocked it
>at 202 mph at 15,500 feet, and 161 mph at 5,500 feet. And that is with a
>fixed pitch propeller.
>
>
>
>The DeltaHawk has half the moving parts of a Lycoming, no spark ignition
>to interfere with the radios, and burns readily available and slightly
>cheaper Jet A. It is much smoother because it's a two-stroke. Plus, since
>the DeltaHawk test platform is a Velocity Std RG, the firewall foreward
>package is pre-designed.
>
>
>
>No, I don't own stock in the company. Just excited about the first
>significant improvement in general aviation powerplants in 50 years.
>
>
>
>Doug Holub
>
>Std Top Door, 50% done, 80% to go
>
>----- Original Message -----
>
>From: <mailto:NMFlyer1 at aol.com>NMFlyer1 at aol.com
>
>To: <mailto:reflector at tvbf.org>reflector at tvbf.org
>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 9:18 PM
>
>Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: Engine Selection
>
>
>
>nice idea Doug... but not enough power scotty
>
>_______________________________________________
>To change your email address, visit
><http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector>http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>Visit the gallery! <http://www.tvbf.org/gallery>www.tvbf.org/gallery
>user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>Check new archives: <http://www.tvbf.org/pipermail>www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>Check old archives:
><http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html>http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>
>----------
>_______________________________________________
>To change your email address, visit
>http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
>user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
>
>_______________________________________________
>To change your email address, visit
>http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
>Visit the gallery! www.tvbf.org/gallery
>user:pw = tvbf:jamaicangoose
>Check new archives: www.tvbf.org/pipermail
>Check old archives: http://www.tvbf.org/archives/velocity/maillist.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/private/reflector/attachments/20040617/3b1fc58d/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Reflector
mailing list