REFLECTOR:Re: RG vs. Fixed
reflector@tvbf.org
reflector@tvbf.org
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:19:05 EDT
In a message dated 6/3/03 9:53:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
mooneydryver@yahoo.com writes:
<< I feel like
I'm flying an airplane not a car with wings.
John >>
How many birds fly with there legs and feet down? Anyway, I have about
600hrs in my STD-RG. The retract system has never given any problems, but I am
still relieved when the greens come on. Some times I bat the RG vs FG back and
fourth if I would do it again. From the inside it still looks the same if it
is a RG or FG. I am not really sure what the speed loss would be with a good
fitting farings. I think 10kt could be high. I have a IO-360 @210hpw/
10-1pistons and mt. I true at 178kts balls to the wall above 8K. What about other'
fliers REAL no B.S. #'s. You guys that like to keep data bases should start a
real performance # data base starting with mine. This could also include
real takeoff and landing #'s. By the way, other than the diminished takeoff and
initial climb, I cruise just as fast with my fixed pitch performance prop @ 1"
less MP and 5%less fuel with way less propeller problems than the mt.
TEC
What ever floats you boat.
TEC