Imbalanced fuel flow: was Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
Brian Michalk
reflector@tvbf.org
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:35:23 -0500
I've got a perfect solution.
Install a fuel gauge in each wing tank.
Feed the output from each gauge into a "rudder autopilot". Let the
autopilot fly the airplane as needed to keep the fuel tanks level.
Kinda toungue in cheek.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reflector-admin@tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-admin@tvbf.org]On
> Behalf Of Chuck Jensen
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 10:11 AM
> To: 'reflector@tvbf.org'
> Subject: RE: Imbalanced fuel flow: was Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
>
>
> Scott,
>
> Good idea. I'll give that a look-see. In turns, I feel lucky if
> I keep the
> ball anywhere near the lubber lines, but in straight and near-level, that
> should be easy to see.
>
> If a person thinks about the problem a little (which always gives me a
> headache), it would only take a wing being a couple inches low to
> make quite
> a difference in fuel feed between the tanks.
>
> I am still wondering if the left tank goes to 0, will I have to fly in a
> slight slip to keep my right tank feeding? Or will the usual
> variations of
> flight continue to keep the sump filled as the right wing goes up
> momentarily? If it will, then no problem....except, of course,
> when I turn
> a right base onto final with a quartering head wind from the right. My
> rough calculations (and bad luck) indicate I would run out of
> fuel about 1/2
> mile short of the threshold. My headache is getting worse.
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reflector-admin@tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-admin@tvbf.org]On
> Behalf Of Scott Derrick
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: reflector@tvbf.org
> Subject: Imbalanced fuel flow: was Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
>
>
> Chuck,
>
> I'd bet your plane is not trimmed correctly. I had imbalance tanks after
> flying a short while when I first bought my plane. I futzed with the
> caps. no change.
>
> The ball was not quite centered within the lubber lines when I was
> flying straight and level.
>
> So I tried this. I flew a while until the tanks were 5-6 gallons
> different, then I held a rudder in to put the ball on the opposite side
> it was sitting on but all the way on the other side of the lubber line.
> Flew a very short while and the tanks evened out.
>
> If you shim out the correct rudder so the ball is exactly in the middle
> I think your imbalance will be cured. Its a simple fix, just shim out
> the correct rudder to get the ball centered. Its an easy thing to try, I
> used a dab of JB Weld to shim it out.
>
> Scott
>
> Chuck Jensen wrote:
> > Good stuff on the vent system. I've been greasing (petro jelly) the O
> > rings on the fuel caps but didn't even think about the O ring on the
> > locking lever. During a long cruise, I'll get a 9 gallon indicated
> > differential between the tanks, so these efforts might reduce that
> > differential. I wasn't too concerned as I understand some differential
> > is almost expected.
> >
> > Though I've never gone there, what happens when left tank is 0 and the
> > right is 9 gallons? Will the rest of the fuel draw from the right tank
> > or will I have to pull off on the side of the road and hitch a ride for
> > gas? I'd hate to think I was carrying 9-10 gallons of useless
> ballast in
> > my tanks but I'm not (intentionally) going to find out. Anyone been
> > there, done that?
> >
> > Chuck
> > XL RG 540
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: reflector-admin@tvbf.org [mailto:reflector-admin@tvbf.org]On
> > Behalf Of Ronnie Brown
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 7:46 AM
> > To: reflector@tvbf.org
> > Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
> >
> > I think the two primary reasons for the fuel tank imbalance are (1)
> > airplane flying out of trim, i.e. one wing low; (2) a fuel tank cap
> > leak.
> >
> > Enlarging the vent system to 3/8" instead of the original 1/4" will
> > greatly improve the impacts from (2) a leaking fuel cap. 3/8
> > tubing has double the area of a 1/4" tube and will pass twice as
> > much air. The reason this matters is that we are only talking about
> > 2 feet of fuel level from the bottom of the sump to the top of the
> > tanks. This is less than 1 psi. It doesn't take much of a cap leak
> > to pull a slight vacuum on that tank which causes that tank to fill
> > up. Keep those O rings vaselined and also make sure the cap is
> > pulling all the way down (adjust the lock nut on the back side of
> > the cap). There is also a small O ring on the shaft of the locking
> > lever that needs to be lubricated. If you want to check how tightly
> > your caps are sealing, connect a tube to the vent line, blow in it
> > (keep the pressure less than 1 psi!) and spray the caps with a
> > water-dish detergent mixture.
> >
> > The original Velocity design had separate vents for each tank -
> > which led to lots of problems. It is impossible to create two vent
> > outlets that have the same static pressure at 200 mph!!! Hence the
> > single vent system now used. It is also important that the vent
> > tubing slope upward to the manifold or you can trap some fuel and
> > create a tank vent pressure imbalance which will lead to different
> > fuel levels in the tank.
> >
> > Ronnie
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: KeithHallsten <mailto:KeithHallsten@quiknet.com>
> > To: reflector@tvbf.org <mailto:reflector@tvbf.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:20 PM
> > Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
> >
> > Yes! Everything you say "SHOULD" be true. Unfortunately, we
> > continue to get these reports from the flying population
> > regarding odd behavior of the fuel/vent system!
> >
> > I think that at times the vent system supplies air to the sump
> > tank just a TINY bit more easily than the longer path through
> > the strakes supplies fuel to the sump tank. It's probably a
> > transient event, just persisting long enough to actuate the "low
> > fuel" warning and scare the bejesus out of the pilot. I see
> > little risk in shutting the vent line to the sump tank, thereby
> > assuring that the flow into the sump tank must come from the
> > strake tanks.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ronnie Brown <mailto:romott@adelphia.net>
> > To: reflector@tvbf.org <mailto:reflector@tvbf.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:55 PM
> > Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
> >
> > If the vent lines slope upward to the manifold from the
> > three tanks, there shouldn't be any problems trapping air or
> > fuel. The fuel should go down and the vent air goes up.
> > And the fuel in the sump tank vent should seek the same
> > level as in the fuel in the main tanks, thereby keeping the
> > sump tank full and the alarm off.
> >
> > Ronnie
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: KeithHallsten <mailto:KeithHallsten@quiknet.com>
> > To: reflector@tvbf.org <mailto:reflector@tvbf.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:51 PM
> > Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
> >
> > Rene',
> >
> > I'm not flying yet, so my comments can be discounted
> > accordingly. I plan to install a manual vent shut-off
> > valve between the sump tank and the vent manifold. The
> > result will be that the vent system can allow the main
> > strake tanks to drain, but can't introduce air into the
> > sump tank. I have a theory that the vent line to the
> > sump tank causes more problems than it solves, once the
> > initial "burp" of air is allowed to escape from the sump
> > tank (before engine start).
> >
> > Keith Hallsten
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Rene Dugas <mailto:rdugas@bayou.com>
> > To: reflector@tvbf.org <mailto:reflector@tvbf.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:00 PM
> > Subject: RE: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
> >
> > Thanks Jack,
> >
> > I felt that maybe the boundary layer was causing a
> > vacuum allowing air to enter the sump but not the
> > tanks. I don not want to over pressure my tanks and
> > rupture them at high pressures. I can splice a gage
> > into the line but wanted to glean info from the
> > informed (flying) few. Since all three tanks are
> > connected to the manifold I remain perplexed.
> > Thanks for the info on the Vision. Two engine
> > builders told me significant fluctuations with the
> > engine pump are common but no pressure numbers were
> > available. I talked to Lycoming. He air might be
> > in the line but I don't see how. Thanks
> >
> > Rene'
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: reflector-admin@tvbf.org
> > [mailto:reflector-admin@tvbf.org] On Behalf Of Jack
> > Sheehan
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:35 PM
> > To: reflector@tvbf.org
> > Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Low fuel light
> >
> >
> >
> > Rene'
> >
> > I can not say much about the low fuel light except
> > that I have not had that on my XL-RG and I am not
> > extending the vent. Mine is as you described in the
> > plumbing except the vent line under the belly is cut
> > off almost flush with the fuselage. I have tested my
> > sump warning light durin the test flight period by
> > getting pretty low on fuel and then pushing the nose
> > over and maintain a dive for enough time for the
> > sump light to start to flicker The low pressure
> > warning from the VM1000 is a common indication. I
> > have spoken with Vision micro about it and the good
> > news is the VM1000 is working fine and the bad news
> > is the lack of pressure is real. it is the way the
> > lycoming pump works and if you have an analog system
> > with low sensitivity you never see it. They have
> > sent me a snubber to install in the sensor line
> > which will in theory reduce thesensitivity. ther is
> > a similar snubber device in the manifold pressure
> > system. I will let you know when I get some free
> > time to install it.
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > N55XL
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
> http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
>
> Visit the gallery! tvbf:jamaicangoose
> _______________________________________________
> To change your email address, visit
http://www.tvbf.org/mailman/listinfo/reflector
Visit the gallery! tvbf:jamaicangoose