REFLECTOR:Static Port

Wayne Owens reflector@tvbf.org
Fri, 4 Jul 2003 16:50:48 -0400


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C3424C.6B4F1B40
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wasn't too clear was it.

My TAS was reading higher than my average GPS ground speed over a =
course.
I experimented by  adding a layer or two of duct tape to my bump to =
confirm what happens.  The static pressure was lowered so the delta P =
over the airspeed  indicator (scale) was greater. The air speed read =
higher still.  It confirmed I needed to sand off some more of my =
fiberglass bump.

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Scott Derrick" <scott@tnstaafl.net>
To: <reflector@tvbf.org>
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Static Port


> Ok, let me get this straight...
>=20
> Raising the bump will raise the static pressure thus lowering your=20
> indicated airspeed?
>=20
> Lowering the bump will lower the static pressure thus raising your=20
> indicated airspeed?
>=20
> Scott
>=20
>=20
> Wayne Owens wrote:
> > Applying a layer of duct tape over the bump should make it read =
higher.
> > Sanding it off about 0.015 inch at a time should lower your =
indicated
> > airspeed.
> > Wayne
> > ----- Original Message -----=20
> > From: "Scott Derrick" <scott@tnstaafl.net>
> > To: <reflector@tvbf.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:25 PM
> > Subject: REFLECTOR:Static Port
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> >>In this months Sport Aviation there is an article on how to =
calibrate
> >>your airspeed indicator.  The article mentions that the most often
> >>problem with incorrect airspeed indicators is the static port not
> >>providing a true static pressure.
> >>
> >>I'm sure mine is off at cruise speeds. I think it reads a lower =
pressure
> >>than it should thus causing the airspeed indicator to register a =
higher
> >>indicated speed than it should.
> >>
> >>I have the standard 3 tiny holes in a vertical pattern  with a small
> >>aluminum block in front of the holes.   This is located about 10 =
inches
> >>below the pilot side elevator on the fuselage.
> >>
> >>Any body else determine theirs was not optimal?  Any easy fixes?
> >>
> >>Scott

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C3424C.6B4F1B40
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<DIV>Wasn't too clear was it.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>My TAS was reading higher than my average GPS ground speed over a=20
course.</DIV>
<DIV>I&nbsp;experimented by &nbsp;adding a layer or two of duct tape to =
my bump=20
to confirm what happens.&nbsp; The static pressure was lowered so the =
delta P=20
over the airspeed&nbsp; indicator (scale) was greater.&nbsp;<FONT=20
color=3D#ff0000>The air speed read higher still.</FONT>&nbsp; It =
confirmed I=20
needed to sand off some more of my fiberglass bump.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV>From: "Scott Derrick" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:scott@tnstaafl.net">scott@tnstaafl.net</A>&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>To: &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:reflector@tvbf.org">reflector@tvbf.org</A>&gt;</DIV>
<DIV>Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 4:12 PM</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: Re: REFLECTOR:Static Port</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>&gt; Ok, let me get this straight...<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; =
Raising the=20
bump will raise the static pressure thus lowering your <BR>&gt; =
indicated=20
airspeed?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Lowering the bump will lower the static =
pressure thus=20
raising your <BR>&gt; indicated airspeed?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Scott<BR>&gt; =

<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Wayne Owens wrote:<BR>&gt; &gt; Applying a layer of =
duct tape=20
over the bump should make it read higher.<BR>&gt; &gt; Sanding it off =
about=20
0.015 inch at a time should lower your indicated<BR>&gt; &gt; =
airspeed.<BR>&gt;=20
&gt; Wayne<BR>&gt; &gt; ----- Original Message ----- <BR>&gt; &gt; From: =
"Scott=20
Derrick" &lt;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:scott@tnstaafl.net">scott@tnstaafl.net</A>&gt;<BR>&gt; =
&gt; To:=20
&lt;<A =
href=3D"mailto:reflector@tvbf.org">reflector@tvbf.org</A>&gt;<BR>&gt; =
&gt;=20
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:25 PM<BR>&gt; &gt; Subject: =
REFLECTOR:Static=20
Port<BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt; <BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;In this =
months=20
Sport Aviation there is an article on how to calibrate<BR>&gt; =
&gt;&gt;your=20
airspeed indicator.&nbsp; The article mentions that the most =
often<BR>&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;problem with incorrect airspeed indicators is the static port=20
not<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;providing a true static pressure.<BR>&gt; =
&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;I'm sure mine is off at cruise speeds. I think it reads a lower=20
pressure<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;than it should thus causing the airspeed =
indicator to=20
register a higher<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;indicated speed than it =
should.<BR>&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;I have the standard 3 tiny holes in a vertical=20
pattern&nbsp; with a small<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;aluminum block in front of =
the=20
holes.&nbsp;&nbsp; This is located about 10 inches<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;below =
the=20
pilot side elevator on the fuselage.<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; =
&gt;&gt;Any body=20
else determine theirs was not optimal?&nbsp; Any easy fixes?<BR>&gt;=20
&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; &gt;&gt;Scott<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C3424C.6B4F1B40--