REFLECTOR:Vortex Generators on XL

KeithHallsten reflector@tvbf.org
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 22:39:33 -0800


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C3BC49.D19F0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alex,

It sounds like we are just mincing words here.  "Mixing high energy flow =
with the boundary layer" sounds a whole lot like turbulent flow to me!!  =
If there's some subtle difference, I'm afraid it's lost on me.  It seems =
to me that the flow layer along the skin is energized by the turbulence =
imparted by the VGs!  At any rate, I think we both have a fairly clear =
concept of what the VGs are doing.=20

Keith

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Alex Balic=20
  To: reflector@tvbf.org=20
  Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 4:45 PM
  Subject: RE: REFLECTOR:Vortex Generators on XL


  Keith,=20
  You are correct about the way that VG's work for the most part, and I =
was hoping not to start a really big discussion about this, but I =
suppose that is the intent of this news group.  The reason that laminar =
flow is lost, is because skin friction slows the airflow within about =
.01 or so the surface the surface of the wing. This flow, lacking =
kinetic energy (relative to the surface of the wing) is drawn into the =
negative pressure area above the wing, separates from the surface, and =
becomes turbulent.  Vortex generators are designed to mix the air that =
still contains energy (which fortunately is close to the wing surface) =
with the low energy air at the wing surface, and thereby maintaining =
laminar flow further back into the negative pressure area than would be =
possible without this mixing.  If you look at a wind tunnel test you =
will see the vortices moving wildly back across the wing, but upon close =
inspection, there is an energized layer of laminar flow against the =
skin. This extended laminar flow is what the vortices make possible, and =
what keeps the wing flying at a higher angle of attack.
------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C3BC49.D19F0500
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1276" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Alex,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>It sounds like we are just mincing =
words=20
here.&nbsp; "Mixing high energy flow with the boundary layer" sounds a =
whole lot=20
like turbulent flow to me!!&nbsp; If there's some subtle difference, I'm =
afraid=20
it's lost on me.&nbsp; It seems to me that the flow layer along the skin =
is=20
energized by the turbulence imparted by the VGs!&nbsp; At any rate, I =
think we=20
both have a fairly clear concept of what the VGs are doing. =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Keith</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dalex157@direcway.com =
href=3D"mailto:alex157@direcway.com">Alex=20
  Balic</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dreflector@tvbf.org=20
  href=3D"mailto:reflector@tvbf.org">reflector@tvbf.org</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, December 06, =
2003 4:45=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: REFLECTOR:Vortex =
Generators=20
  on XL</DIV>
  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial =
size=3D2></FONT><FONT=20
  face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
  size=3D2></FONT><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT><BR></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D243531900-07122003><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff=20
  size=3D2>Keith, </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
  <DIV><SPAN class=3D243531900-07122003><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>You=20
  are correct about the way that VG's work for the most part, and I was =
hoping=20
  not to start a really big discussion about this, but I suppose that is =
the=20
  intent of this news group.&nbsp; The reason that laminar flow is lost, =
is=20
  because skin friction slows the airflow&nbsp;within about .01&nbsp;or=20
  so&nbsp;the surface&nbsp;the surface of the wing. This flow, lacking =
kinetic=20
  energy (relative to the surface of the wing) is drawn into the =
negative=20
  pressure area above the wing, separates from the surface, and becomes=20
  turbulent.&nbsp;&nbsp;Vortex generators are designed to mix the air =
that still=20
  contains energy (which fortunately is&nbsp;close to the&nbsp;wing=20
  surface)</FONT></SPAN><SPAN class=3D243531900-07122003><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
  color=3D#0000ff size=3D2> with the low energy air at the wing surface, =
and thereby=20
  maintaining laminar flow further back into the negative pressure area =
than=20
  would be possible without this mixing.&nbsp; If you look at a wind =
tunnel test=20
  you will see the vortices moving wildly back across the wing, but upon =
close=20
  inspection, there is an energized layer of laminar flow against the=20
  skin.&nbsp;This extended laminar flow is&nbsp;what the vortices make =
possible,=20
  and what keeps the wing flying at a higher angle of=20
attack.</FONT></SPAN></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C3BC49.D19F0500--