[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel

To: reflector@awpi.com, Peter Beaty <PETER.J.BEATY@usa.dupont.com>
Subject: Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel
From: Matt Harrop <matt@mattcave.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 11:54:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.19990415103314.006d98b0@engg.lvs.dupont.com>
References: <4.1.19990406182645.00ba3440@mail.interlog.com><199904062107.OAA11507@sabretooth.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: reflector@awpi.com, Matt Harrop <matt@mattcave.ca>
Sender: owner-reflector@awpi.com

At 10:33 AM 4/15/99 -0400, you wrote:
>At 06:46 PM 4/6/99 -0400, Matt Harrop wrote:
> I plan to install an electric AI as a backup to the vacuum
>>driven instruments.  Having a vacuum gyro and an electric gyro means that a
>>single failure can't take them both out.  
>
>What's wrong with a motor driven backup vacuum pump? 
>
>
Several people have pointed this out to me.  Sounds like an electric
standby vacuum
pump is the way to go.

References:
- Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel
  - From: Matt Harrop <matt@mattcave.ca>
- Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel
  - From: David Karas <David.Karas@eng.sun.com>
- Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel
  - From: Peter Beaty <PETER.J.BEATY@usa.dupont.com>

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: REFLECTOR: EFIS
Prev by thread: Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel
Next by thread: Re: REFLECTOR: SNF & Panel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread