[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Engine

Thanks for the prompt return on my email
Don't get me wrong I was not questioning your choice just looking for more

I am giving a hard look at the LS1 motor because I am building an XL.
which can use the extra hp and for the weight I should be able to over come

The reduction unit I like so far is Fred Gerschwender unit and as far as a
track record  he has been building unit for auto conversions for 30 years.

You may be interested in an article about Fred and his work.The article is
in Sport 
Aviation March 1997 I found it very interesting.
Ron N34CV
> From: Al Gietzen <alventures@email.msn.com>
> To: roncathy@ameritech.net
> Subject: Re:  Engine
> Date: Sunday, June 07, 1998 10:09 AM
> Ron;
> >Al You said you have done an in depth search for the right engine for
> >you and have chosen the rotary engine
> Well, I din't use the term "in depth" but I guess it's relative. I looked
> lot of options.  No doubt; engine selection, and parameters that make it
> work, is a complex task.  But interesting.  There are many unknowns, so
> end up making some judgements.  Although I intended to, I haven't yet
> to Fred.  My understanding is that most of what he's done that's flying
> under the 200+ criteria that I set.
> I also wanted an engine with some proving in airplanes.  There are a
> of interesting new multivalve, all-aluminum engines that could be
> choices, but I didn't want to be the first.  The rotaries have
> significant numbers of hours in aircraft and race cars and have proven to
> pretty robust.
> The data that I have on the LS1 show a basic engine weight of about 450
> which already exceeds my limit of 400 lb full-up installation.  A full
> installation would be over 500 lbs.  And we don't need its 345 rated hp.
> Maybe for an XL.  And I also have the criteria for a "clean"
> i.e., no distortions of the cowling that mess up air flow to the prop. 
> three rotor rotary fits nicely in the cowl (even allowing taking down the
> bumps on the standard cowl).  Basic engine wieght is 270 lbs.  With
> accessories, reduction unit, cooling and coolant, etc.; still should come
> right about 400lbs.  And there is probably some advantage to an engine
> only has four moving parts; with the main moving mass, the rotors, going
> 1/3 the shaft speed.
> I'm pretty sure that with fuel injection you can get better fuel economy
> than an aircraft engine; probably about 10 to 12% better.  The engine
> prefers automotive fuel (mogas) so you can get a price break when it's
> available.  But it will still be about 10% worse than a good piston
> conversion.
> I'll accept that slightly higher fuel burn for an engine that fits my
> criteria.  I'm sure there are other good choices; the proof will be in
> flying.
> Last, but maybe not least; cost is reasonable.  The fully rebuilt engine
> will cost about $10K, including parts and labor and the psru.  Add about
> for fuel injection.  Another $1000 or so will get you a turbo so you can
> maintain that power up in the flight levels.  Not bad.
> Hope this helps.  Good luck with your project.
> Al Gietzen